<feed version="0.3" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xml:lang="en-US"><title>Security Industry News &gt;&gt; EMERgency24 Inc.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/default.aspx" /><tagline type="text/html">Security Industry News collected by EMERgency24.</tagline><id>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/default.aspx</id><author><url>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/default.aspx</url></author><generator url="http://communityserver.org" version="1.1.0.50615">Community Server</generator><modified>2013-05-02T14:16:00Z</modified><entry><title>Lower Macungie Township, PA, Passes Tougher Alarm Ordinance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/21/1204.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1204</id><created>2013-05-21T15:05:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.wfmz.com/news/news-regional-lehighvalley/tougher-penalties-coming-for-anyone-producing-false-alarms-in-lower-macungie/-/132502/20180336/-/mx92fxz/-/index.html"&gt;A tougher new law aimed at reducing false fire alarms may be passed in June in Lower Macungie Township, PA.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That ordinance allows up to three false alarms in a 12-month period before anyone has to pay a fine. The proposed change would allow only one penalty-free false alarm every six months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, now no one can be fined more than $300 for exceeding the allowable number of false alarms. “In theory, it could be a dollar or it could be $299,” said Reis.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposed change will make it a set fine rather than a sliding fine, with different penalties for homes and businesses. Township commissioner Roger C. Reis explained the fine will be $150 per incident for residential structures and $300 for commercial structures.&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1204" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1204</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Cornelius, NC, Alarm Ordinance as of June 1</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/21/1203.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1203</id><created>2013-05-21T15:02:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.corneliustoday.com/97-featuredarticles/969-new-false-alarm-ordinance-starts-june-1"&gt;A new Cornelius, NC, False Alarm Reduction Program begins on June 1, which means fines for repeated false alarms.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The registration fee is $10 a year with a renewal fee of $10 each subsequent year. The registration fees are waived for residents who are 65 years or older.&amp;nbsp; The registration period began on March 1, 2013. Fines for false alarms will be assessed beginning June 1, 2013, on a tiered system as follows:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;False Alarms 1, 2: No charge for registered alarms&lt;br&gt;False Alarms 3, 4, 5: $50 per response&lt;br&gt;False Alarms 6, 7: $100 per response&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;False Alarms 8, 9: $250 per response&lt;br&gt;False Alarms 10+: $500 per response&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1203" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1203</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Enhanced Call Verification Now Law in Georgia</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/21/1202.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1202</id><created>2013-05-21T14:55:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.securitysystemsnews.com/blog/enhanced-call-verification-now-law-georgia"&gt;Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal signed enhanced call verification into law on May 6. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Georgia Electronic Life Safety &amp;amp; Systems Association, with an assist from the Security Industry Alarm Coalition, had been pushing for ECV for years and finally saw it brought to fruition with House Bill 59.&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1202" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1202</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Judge: Fire Department Can't Limit System Choices </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/21/1201.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1201</id><created>2013-05-21T14:48:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.lowellsun.com/todaysheadlines/ci_23281473/lowell-officials-alarmed-by-court-ruling-fire-alarms#ixzz2TwG1UYZa"&gt;A Housing Court judge in Lowell, MA, has ruled that the city cannot force building owners to install just one of the four types of fire-alarm signaling systems allowed under state law.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The judge's determination comes as Lowell's fire chief has in recent years been ordering owners of buildings with 13 or more residential units to install a new wireless alarm system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Northeast Housing Court Associate Justice David Kerman made the ruling in a decision dismissing complaints the Fire Department had filed against Princeton Properties of Lowell for failing to switch three of its properties off the telegraph-wire fire-alarm system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The telegraph-wire, or "Gamewell," system is approved under state law, but the city has been planning to decommission it, so it directed Princeton and other property owners to install new alarm systems at their buildings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At two properties the city filed complaints against, containing hundreds of residential units, the city ordered Princeton to replace the old system with a new wireless alarm system provided by one vendor, East Coast Security Services of Salem, N.H.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But in dismissing the complaints against the two residential properties, as well as one of Princeton's commercial properties, Kerman ruled that municipalities cannot restrict property owners to using just one of the four fire-alarm signaling systems that comply with the state's Building Code.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Allowing a city to narrow an owner's options would sanction the development of different building codes in each of the Commonwealth's 351 cities and towns, precisely the result that promulgation of the State Building Code was meant to prevent," Kerman wrote in his April 4 decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In his decision, Kerman referred to a state Supreme Judicial Court ruling last year that invalidated the city of Springfield's fire-alarm ordinance.&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1201" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1201</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Fairfield, CT, Fire Chief Wants to Curb False Alarms</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/17/1200.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1200</id><created>2013-05-17T20:16:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.fairfieldcitizenonline.com/news/article/Fire-chief-wants-policy-to-curb-false-fire-alarms-4521551.php"&gt;As the Fairfield, CT, Police Department did nearly 20 years ago, the Fire Department is weighing a policy designed to cut down on the number of false alarms in town.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fire Chief Richard Felner told the Fire Commission last week that he is considering a false fire alarm policy for town, and has been talking to the Police Department officials to see what they have in place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1200" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1200</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Maryland Law: 10-Year Lithium Batteries in Smoke Detectors</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/17/1199.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1199</id><created>2013-05-17T19:53:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2013/05/new-maryland-law-dictates-need-for-smoke-alarms.html"&gt;Maryland is the most recent state to require that battery-only operated smoke alarms be equipped with sealed-in, 10-year lithium batteries. The new law takes effect on July 1, 2013. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1199" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1199</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Clark County, OH, Sherriff Discusses False Alarms </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/17/1198.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1198</id><created>2013-05-17T19:48:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/news/local/false-alarms-costly-for-clark-sheriff/nXsxQ/"&gt;While the Clark County, OH, Sheriff’s Office believes alarm systems are beneficial to deterring and stopping crime, they need to be able to recoup more of the cost of false dispatches.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The hurdle they face is the Ohio Revised Code, which caps fines at $150 for the fifth false alarm. The cost of paperwork coupled with the actual response of the deputies — two per alarm call — doesn’t make that charge cost-effective, Sheriff Gene Kelly said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“What we choose to do is go out, talk to the business, the homeowner, see if there are any recommendations we can make with their alarm company to improve the service and not have false alarms.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There’s no clear-cut way to solve false alarms but law enforcement agencies agree alarms do help catch criminals and can deter crime. “We want alarms, and alarms do work, and they’re a vital part of law enforcement today,” Kelly said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1198" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1198</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Cheyenne, WY, Proposes Stricter Alarm Ordinance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/15/1197.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1197</id><created>2013-05-15T12:44:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.wyomingnews.com/articles/2013/05/14/news/20local_05-14-13.txt"&gt;A proposed amendment to help reduce the number of false alarms in Cheyenne, WY, was presented to the City Council recently.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Currently, when there is an alarm signal, the central station calls the police and then the alarm owner. The amendment would require the company to call the alarm holder first.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another proposed change is graduated fees for repeat false alarms. After the second false dispatch, an alarm administrator with the department would send a letter to request a written response about what was done to fix the problem and warn of a fee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The third response could result in a $100 fee, followed by a $200 fee for the fourth and a $400 fee for the fifth. On the sixth response, the alarm holder’s permit could be revoked. If revoked, officers won’t respond to the address for alarm activation unless there is a verified crime or a panic or hold-up alarm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The permit may be reinstated if the person shows they’re trying to fix the problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1197" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1197</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Atlanta, GA, Plans to Amend Alarm Ordinance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/14/1196.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1196</id><created>2013-05-14T12:53:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.buckheadview.com/2013/05/city-eyes-program-to-track-reduce-false.html"&gt;According to Hans Utz, Atlanta’s deputy chief operating officer, Atlanta police responded to 65,000 false alarm calls last year and 92 percent of those were false alarms, representing 6 percent of all 911 dispatches and representing a cost of 12 full-time police officers’ time.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To remedy the situation and even raise some revenue for the city—possibly $1-$2 million—the city plans to amend the existing False Alarm Ordinance&amp;nbsp; based on the Georgia Association of Police model - &lt;a href="http://www.siacinc.org/"&gt;developed by the Security Industry Alarm Coalition&lt;/a&gt; - adopted by a number of peer and neighboring cities—including Charlotte, Louisville, Marietta, Cobb County and Sandy Springs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1196" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1196</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Johns Pass, GA, Extends Deadline for Alarm System Registration</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/13/1195.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1195</id><created>2013-05-13T14:03:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.northfulton.com/Articles-NEWS-c-2013-05-09-198707.114126-sub-City-of-Johns-Creek-alarm-ordinance-pushed-back-2-3-months.html"&gt;Businesses and residents in Johns Creek, GA, just got an extension to sign up with the city until August or perhaps September to register their alarm systems.&lt;/a&gt; The original date was June 1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In an effort to reduce the cost false alarms, the city passed an ordinance spelling out the penalties for continued false alarms. The primary fine sets in if police answer a call to an unregistered alarm system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance had been due to take effect next month, but City Manager John Kachmar told the City Council May 6 that would not be practicable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The city has chosen a vendor, Cry Wolf, to administer the ordinance and collect the fees, but the contract still has not been released by the city's legal department for council's signature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The holdup has been selecting the vendor who then must offer the city a contract for approval. Once that is done, the vendor will be sending out notices to tell residents and businesses how to register their alarm," said Mayor Mike Bodker.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1195" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1195</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Summit County, UT, Prioritizes Dispatches; Fines for False Alarms</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/07/1194.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1194</id><created>2013-05-07T13:15:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;p class="MsoPlainText"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.parkrecord.com/news/ci_23167799/false-alarm-fee-proposed"&gt;Summit County,
 UT, burglar alarm owners may be
faced with a fee for too many triggered false alarms.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoPlainText"&gt;"It's something we should probably talk over with
the sheriff to see if it would be something that would make sense," Summit
County Councilmember Roger Armstrong said. &lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p class="MsoPlainText"&gt;The Summit County, UT, Sheriff's Office announced in
February that it would no longer respond to unverified burglar alarms, citing
insufficient deputies.&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p class="MsoPlainText"&gt;After discussions with local alarm companies, however,
the Sheriff's Office recanted the decision, opting instead to continue
responding to verified and unverified alarms through 2013, but with unverified
alarms given a lower priority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1194" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1194</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Lincoln, NE, Looks to Duplicate False-Alarm Reduction Success</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/07/1193.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1193</id><created>2013-05-07T13:03:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://journalstar.com/news/local/false-burglary-alarms-less-frequent-fire-officials-hope-for-similar/article_a828acfd-9da1-5853-ad5d-c51f87cbddc7.html"&gt;Lincoln, NE, police and residents are safer after the number of bogus burglar alarms plummeted by more than half over the past decade.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lincoln Fire and Rescue hopes to duplicate the Police Department's success when it next checks statistics. Firefighters went out on more than 2,000 fire calls last year, including some 1,180 false alarms, Fire Chief John Huff said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The City Council voted in August to start charging business owners and residents $100 after three false fire alarms and $250 after eight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The department’s not trying to get money, Huff said, but he wants to charge people for making false reports and spare his crews from zipping around when they’re not needed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The fewer times we do that, the better,” Huff said. “Every time we do that, we put ourselves at risk, and we put everyone else between here and there at risk.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1193" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1193</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Impact of False Fire Alarms</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/07/1192.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1192</id><created>2013-05-07T12:51:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.khastv.com/news/local/Local-firefighter-weighs-in-on-fines-for-false-alarm-fires--206372081.html"&gt;False fire alarms are costing Lincoln, NE, residents as much as $250.&lt;/a&gt; The City Council voted back in August to start fining for false alarms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the fire department responds to a false alarm it can cost hundreds of dollars, but money isn't the only concern.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Typically when an alarm does come in, we're going to treat it as a real fire. And we're going to go lights and sirens across town at times and it does add a lot of potential for vehicle accidents," said Cory Schmidt, Grand Island Fire Department Chief.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1192" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1192</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>PSAP Consolidation in St. Louis Metropolitan Area</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/07/1191.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1191</id><created>2013-05-07T12:41:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.newsmagazinenetwork.com/2013050634583/central-county-gets-set-to-acquire-north-central-county-fire-alarm/"&gt;The Central County Emergency 911 Board&lt;/a&gt;, which currently provides fire and emergency medical dispatching services for western St. Louis County and portions of Franklin County in Missouri, has approved contracts to provide fire and emergency medical dispatching services to two departments now served by the North Central County Fire Alarm operation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to recently signed contracts, the city of Berkeley Fire Department and the Community Fire Protection District will switch to Ellisville-based Central County on Jan. 1, 2014. Berkeley and Community are the first in what is expected to be a move to Central County by most or all of the operations North Central has been serving.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Due to financial pressures, North Central has announced plans to shut down Oct. 31.&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1191" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1191</wfw:commentRss></entry><entry><title>Dunwoody, GA, Passes Alarm Ordinance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/archive/2013/05/02/1190.aspx" /><id>642676ec-375c-4295-8a3f-21fa8ade2999:1190</id><created>2013-05-02T13:16:00Z</created><content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;a href="http://www.neighbornewspapers.com/view/full_story/22426862/article-Dunwoody-council-aims-to-stop-false-alarms?instance=dunwoody"&gt;The Dunwoody, GA, City council members recently approved an ordinance that holds people financially responsible for false alarms. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The program will work on a two-strike system, and when the third false alarm comes from the same source, there will be a $50 fine. The fine could get as high as $500 with multiple counts," said Bob Mullen, spokesman for the city of Dunwoody.&lt;img src="http://news.emergency24.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1190" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://news.emergency24.com/blogs/industry_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1190</wfw:commentRss></entry></feed>